Sweeney Todd The Barber Of Fleet Street Film Studies Essay

Sweeney Todd The Barber Of Fleet Street Film Studies EssaySweeney Todd the Demon Barber of Fleet Street is the solo film that has been produced legion(predicate) times in various versions. And among all versions there are two that had actually grant an impact in the hearing the original produced in 1936 and the ultimately one in 2007. Furthermore, between some(prenominal) versions of the movie, the most highly praised version of all so far has been the musical film version which was direct in 2007 by Tim Burton with Johnny Depp as Sweeney Todd. Although the original film version wasnt applauded as much as its successor, it didnt exactly surpass the expectations of the viewers the original version was directed in 1936 by George King with Tod Slaughter as the main fictitious character. And even though the version of Sweeney Todd, the Demon Barber of Fleet Street make in 2007 is similar in acting and audio recording it differs in three important aspects such as plot, pedestal a nd setting which conduce a snap of realism and a much greater amount of suspense to the musical version.Firstly, the acting of the character of Sweeney Todd is similar in both movies, he started in capital of the United Kingdom with the name of Benjamin Barker, an owner of a barbershop located in the infamous Fleet Street and who also with the help of Mrs. Lovett they commit grotesque atrocities, for instance Todd penalize people by slitting his customers throat with his straight razor, and he disposed of them by his invention of a revolving trapdoor which sent the corpses directly to the basement, where Mrs. Lovett cooked them and used them as fillings for her pies. In addition, in the acting the protagonists in both movies caused or provoked the audience to feel somewhat identified with their reasons for committing those crimes they played their role astonishingly because they impersonated their character realistically. The protagonists body and facial nerve expressions in bot h movies demonstrate joy and darkness in their actions, and their coldness and instantaneous mood change during and after the massacres, definitely added to the suspense that made the audience feel somehow caught up in the film, impatient to see what event Todds actions had triggered.Additionally, the sound contains important details that show that these two movies are somewhat similar. The sound during both movies played the lay out of providing the audience with the feeling of disgust from hearing the blood dripping or the limbs being cut apart. The sound creates the ambience and it plays the part of preparing the audience for a strong scene which, at the same time, keeps them in the mood for more grotesque and blood soaked parts. The sound basically adds to the movies tensity and anticipation, and makes them scarier.In contrast to the similarities, the 1936 and 2007 versions have tremendous differences, not exactly because theyre the same movie in a different time period but be cause, both films differ in plot, theme and setting, which as mentioned before, these aspects add realism to the version made in 2007, and help the movie solidify, once more, its greatness to a young generation.The plot in the 2007 version made the story of the film more interesting because, the protagonist is influenced by a sense of revenge towards the characters that collaborated in separating him from his family. Todds actions make the events in the film to connect perfectly making it not too complicated to follow. Meanwhile, in the 1936 version, Todd is influenced by greed, which makes the story of the film not interesting, because he only kills for money. Also, the plot becomes complicated to understand and at times, some events dont make sense together for instance, when Todd decided to kill Johannas boyfriend because he came back rich from his voyage. To add to the contrast, the theme in the 2007 version, revolves around revenge and envy, which are emotions that captivate t he peoples attention, besides that, in the 2007 version, Sweeney Todd, is married and has a lovely child, named Johanna. The beauty of Todds wife attracted the attention of the coddle judge Turpin. This judge falsely accuses Todd of a crime he did not commit, gaining custody of Todds wife, Lucy, and Johanna. When Todd returns fifteen years later, he seeks revenge against Turpin and everyone who collaborated with him. On the other hand, the theme in the 1936 version revolves around greed. Where Todd invites wealthy customers to his barbershop and murders them to take their money and help a fleet owner to force his daughter to marry him, which after all, doesnt touch on to the audience very well.Setting as well, was as an aspect that made the 2007 version better than the 1936 version, the setting in the most current version, was in a barbershop located in a dark alley and the main characters only dressed in rags, which gives the movie a more aristocratic scenario and darker sense o f plague and revenge, creating the right atmosphere for the story. In contrast to the 1936 setting, which was in a barbershop located near a port, where many wealthy people were accustomed to spend their take over time and all the characters would wear fine garments. The 1936s setting lacked to create the appropriate atmosphere and made the audience lose interest in the film.After all, the character of Sweeney Todd acted magnificently in both movies, and the sound helped to create a horrific suspense. Nevertheless, the 2007 version, undoubtedly, surpassed its predecessor by plot, theme, and setting. These three aspects helped to create a more realistic and gloomy movie and engaged the audience in a world of revenge, envy, hatred and love.